
Unpredictable port dwell times are a primary driver of cost overruns and network instability in global logistics. A container sitting idle at a port costs money, strains relationships, and disrupts downstream planning. A critical, yet often overlooked, metric for measuring this efficiency is "vessel dwell time", the total time a ship spends at a port, from arrival to departure.
A new analysis of November 2025 data from the SeaVantage "Container Vessel Dwell Time Dashboard" reveals some leaders and laggards in the industry. These five key takeaways highlight the dramatic performance differences across major global gateways and carriers, providing crucial intelligence for logistics professionals.
Click Here to View the Interactive Report
The Port of Busan demonstrated exceptional performance in November 2025, recording the lowest overall vessel dwell time among the 10 major ports analyzed. With a total dwell time of just 19.6 hours, Busan stands out. As one of the world's most critical transshipment hubs, this level of efficiency is not just impressive, it's essential to maintaining fluidity in global trade flows. This performance provides a distinct competitive advantage, reducing delay risks and making Busan an attractive gateway for time-sensitive cargo.
In stark contrast, the Port of Los Angeles was the highest dwell time port in the November analysis. Vessels here experienced a total dwell time of 79.1 hours, more than four times longer than in Busan. This figure positions the port as a critical bottleneck for supply chain planners, highlighting a potential vulnerability that could significantly impact network resilience and on-time performance.
This finding focuses on "waiting time," the idle period a vessel spends waiting for a berth before cargo operations can begin. This metric represents pure, non-productive cost. In November, Maersk A/S logged the highest average waiting time at a single port: 40.1 hours at the Port of Savannah. That is nearly two full days where an expensive vessel and its crew sat idle before any value-generating work could begin. This kind of delay is a significant red flag, signaling not only potential berthing congestion but also raising the risk of downstream demurrage and detention charges and creating a bullwhip effect for inland transportation planning. It is precisely this kind of performance data that shippers and 3PLs leverage in commercial negotiations to demand better service or compensation.
The most extreme dwell time recorded for a single carrier at a specific port belongs to MSC at the Port of Long Beach. In this extreme case, with an average work time and total dwell time both clocking in at 172.0 hours, the data implies a near-zero waiting time. This suggests vessels may have berthed quickly but then became locked in an exceptionally long terminal operation. A vessel spending over a full week at the terminal has major ripple effects on the entire supply chain, impacting everything from yard and rail resource planning to chassis availability.
On the other end of the spectrum, the single most efficient carrier-port combination observed was Matson at the Port of Ningbo, achieving an average dwell time of just 8.4 hours. This remarkable efficiency is not an accident; it's a testament to a specialized business model. Matson is well-known for its premium, expedited services from Asia to the US West Coast, for which shippers pay a premium. This figure, more than 20 times faster than the longest dwell time recorded, serves as a powerful benchmark for what is possible in a high-priority, optimized operational environment.
November's performance data reveals a hyper-fragmented operational landscape where port and carrier choices have direct, quantifiable impacts on supply chain velocity. This level of granular data empowers shippers, 3PLs, and other logistics providers to move beyond assumptions and make smarter, evidence-based decisions for routing, carrier selection, and commercial negotiations.
As we look ahead, how will you use this kind of port-level data to build a more resilient and efficient supply chain?
호르무즈 해협 봉쇄로 인한 리스크가 유가, 해상 운임, 공급망에 미치는 영향을 분석합니다. 통항 차질 이후 물류비 상승 구조와 한국 기업이 모니터링해야 할 핵심 지표를 확인하세요.
컨테이너 추적은 왜 불편할까요? 선사 웹사이트 기반 화물 추적 방식의 한걔와 물류 가시성 플랫폼(Visibility Platform)의 역할을 비교합니다.
호르무즈 해협에 대한 실시간 해상 정보를 확인하세요. SeaVantage의 실시간 지오펜싱 플랫폼으로 원유, LNG, 화물 선박의 이동을 24시간 추적할 수 있습니다.
Demurrage isn't a finance problem — it's a visibility problem. Here's a 2026 playbook for tracking container dwell time, catching demurrage risk early, and reducing avoidable charges before they hit the invoice.
AIS is a commodity in 2026 — the platform you choose depends on what sits on top. Compare the 8 best vessel tracking software platforms and their real strengths.
Here's how secure, expiring tracking links — and the API behind them — fix it. With workflow patterns, ROI math, and a one-week setup checklist.