This interactive Container Vessel Dwell Time Dashboard analyzes November 2025 carrier-level performance across major global gateways, with an emphasis on Southern California (Port of Long Beach & Port of Los Angeles) and major transshipment hubs (Rotterdam, Antwerp, Shanghai, Busan, Ningbo, Singapore, Savannah). Using the dashboard’s dataset, we measure three operational KPIs, Avg. Waiting (hrs), Avg. Working (hrs) and Total Dwell (hrs = waiting + working),so terminal operators, 3PLs, ocean carriers, and shippers can benchmark performance, reduce demurrage risk, and plan yard/rail resources more effectively.
This report includes data from 10 major ports only. SeaVantage, however, maintains vessel dwell time data across all global container ports. To access the full dataset or request a customized report, please contact us directly.
Below are the top-line findings on port dwell times for 10 ports by carrier for November 2025.
1. Lowest Dwell Port: Busan (19.6 hrs)
2. Highest Dwell Port: Los Angeles (79.1 hrs)
3. Carrier with Highest Avg. Wait: Maersk A/S at Savannah (40.1 hrs)
4. Carrier with Highest Avg. Work: MSC at Long Beach (172.0 hrs)
5. Carrier with Highest Avg. Dwell: MSC at Long Beach (172.0 hrs)
6. Carrier with Lowest Avg. Dwell: Matson at Ningbo (8.4 hrs)
These figures are pulled directly from the dashboard’s November 2025 dataset and are displayed in the KPI panels and table. Use the port and carrier filters to replicate these results interactively.
Operations & planning: Terminal planning teams can forecast required berth hours and chassis availability by comparing carrier work-time profiles.
Carrier performance benchmarking: 3PLs and shippers can identify carriers with consistently high wait/working times to inform tender and routing decisions.
Commercial negotiations: Use port- and carrier-level evidence to negotiate priority berthing or compensation for prolonged dwell.
Network resilience: Supply chain planners can re-route or re-time sailings around high-dwell gateways to reduce delay risk.
Waiting (hrs) - time the vessel/container spent waiting outside or before active operations at the terminal (recorded per carrier/port).
Working (hrs) - active on-dock operations (stevedoring, container handling) recorded per carrier/port.
Total dwell (hrs) - sum of waiting + working (displayed on the dashboard and used for port averages).
1. Select a Port from the left filter to reveal carrier-level stacked bars (Avg. Waiting and Avg. Working).
2. Optionally select a Shipping Line to compare that carrier across all ports (table view).
3. Use the KPI cards to quickly identify: lowest/highest dwell ports, carrier with highest wait/work, and the single highest/lowest dwell instances.
2025년 9월, 주요 글로벌 항만에서 어떤 운송사가 가장 긴 선박 체류 시간을 기록했는지 확인해보세요. 트렌드를 비교하고, 지연을 파악하며, 전체 항만 데이터를 통해 운송 전략을 최적화할 수 있습니다.
2025년 8월, 주요 글로벌 항만에서 어떤 운송사가 가장 긴 선박 체류 시간을 기록했는지 확인해보세요. 트렌드를 비교하고, 지연을 파악하며, 전체 항만 데이터를 통해 운송 전략을 최적화할 수 있습니다.
2025년 7월, 주요 글로벌 항만에서 어떤 운송사가 가장 긴 선박 체류 시간을 기록했는지 확인해보세요. 트렌드를 비교하고, 지연을 파악하며, 전체 항만 데이터를 통해 운송 전략을 최적화할 수 있습니다.
.jpg)
Explore November 2025 global port dwell time data. See which ports and carriers led in efficiency across Antwerp, Busan, Long Beach, Rotterdam, and Singapore.
See which carriers experienced the longest vessel dwell times at major ports in November 2025. Uncover congestion trends and leverage detailed port data to optimize your shipping operations.
Discover how RTTVP is a game-changer for Logistics Service Providers. Learn the 5 core benefits, from B2B customer experience to predictive operational planning.
.png)
