BloG

Container Vessel Dwell Time by Carrier – October 2025 Analysis

Container Dwell Time Report Overview

This interactive Container Vessel Dwell Time Dashboard analyzes October 2025 carrier-level performance across major global gateways, with an emphasis on Southern California (Port of Long Beach & Port of Los Angeles) and major transshipment hubs (Rotterdam, Antwerp, Shanghai, Busan, Ningbo, Singapore, Savannah). Using the dashboard’s dataset, we measure three operational KPIs, Avg. Waiting (hrs), Avg. Working (hrs) and Total Dwell (hrs = waiting + working),so terminal operators, 3PLs, ocean carriers, and shippers can benchmark performance, reduce demurrage risk, and plan yard/rail resources more effectively.

This report includes data from 10 major ports only. SeaVantage, however, maintains vessel dwell time data across all global container ports. To access the full dataset or request a customized report, please contact us directly.


Breakdown of port dwell times by carrier – October 2025

Port Dwell Time BI Dashboard

Lowest Dwell Port

-

Highest Dwell Port

-

Carrier w/ Highest Avg. Wait

-

Carrier w/ Highest Avg. Work

-

Carrier w/ Highest Avg. Dwell

-

Carrier w/ Lowest Avg. Dwell

-

Carrier Dwell Time by Port

Please select a port from the filter to see the carrier breakdown.

Detailed View (0 entries)

Port Shipping Line Avg. Wait (hrs) Avg. Work (hrs) Total Dwell (hrs)


Top-line findings (October 2025)

1. Longest average port dwell (port-level average dwell): Los Angeles - 87.92 hrs (avg wait 1.07 hrs, avg work 86.85 hrs).

2. Second-highest port dwell: Antwerp - 85.43 hrs (avg wait 44.27 hrs, avg work 41.16 hrs).

3. Lowest average port dwell in the dataset: Busan - 19.20 hrs (avg wait 0.00 hrs, avg work 19.20 hrs).

4. Single worst carrier instance (highest total dwell for a single carrier at a single port): Evergreen Line at Rotterdam - 204.30 hrs total dwell (waiting 97.3 hrs + working 107.0 hrs).

5. Largest recorded waiting time for a single carrier/port: COSCO Shipping at Antwerp - 117.0 hrs waiting (total dwell 151.4 hrs).

6. Shortest single-carrier dwell observed: SITC at Ningbo - 10.20 hrs total dwell (working 10.2 hrs).

These figures are pulled directly from the dashboard’s October 2025 dataset and are displayed in the KPI panels and table. Use the port and carrier filters to replicate these results interactively.

Key operational use cases

Operations & planning: Terminal planning teams can forecast required berth hours and chassis availability by comparing carrier work-time profiles.

Carrier performance benchmarking: 3PLs and shippers can identify carriers with consistently high wait/working times to inform tender and routing decisions.

Commercial negotiations: Use port- and carrier-level evidence to negotiate priority berthing or compensation for prolonged dwell.

Network resilience: Supply chain planners can re-route or re-time sailings around high-dwell gateways to reduce delay risk.

How the dashboard calculates metrics (methodology)

Waiting (hrs) - time the vessel/container spent waiting outside or before active operations at the terminal (recorded per carrier/port).

Working (hrs) - active on-dock operations (stevedoring, container handling) recorded per carrier/port.

Total dwell (hrs) - sum of waiting + working (displayed on the dashboard and used for port averages).

How to use this page (quick guide)

1. Select a Port from the left filter to reveal carrier-level stacked bars (Avg. Waiting and Avg. Working).

2. Optionally select a Shipping Line to compare that carrier across all ports (table view).

3. Use the KPI cards to quickly identify: lowest/highest dwell ports, carrier with highest wait/work, and the single highest/lowest dwell instances.

Need Full Access to Global Port Dwell Time Data?

Make smarter routing and carrier decisions with real-time dwell time insights across all major container ports worldwide.

최근 게시물
호르무즈 해협이란? 위치, 원유·LNG 공급, 봉쇄 가능성, 한국 영향 총정리
물류 인사이트
호르무즈 해협이란? 위치, 원유·LNG 공급, 봉쇄 가능성, 한국 영향 총정리

호르무즈 해협 위치부터 세계 원유·LNG 공급망에서의 역할, 이란의 봉쇄 가능성, 한국에 미치는 영향까지 한눈에 정리했습니다. 최신 데이터와 사례를 바탕으로 공급망 리스크를 쉽게 이해해 보세요.

June 26, 2026
항만 혼잡도란? 발생 원인부터 공급망 리스크 모니터링까지
물류 인사이트
항만 혼잡도란? 발생 원인부터 공급망 리스크 모니터링까지

항만 혼잡도는 선박 지연, ETA 정확도, 디머리지 비용에 영향을 미치는 핵심 지표입니다. 발생 원인부터 주요 항만 모니터링 방법까지 확인해 보세요.

June 10, 2026
호르무즈 해협 현재 상황(2026년 6월): 호르무즈 해협 봉쇄 영향과 공급망 리스크 총정리
물류 인사이트
호르무즈 해협 현재 상황(2026년 6월): 호르무즈 해협 봉쇄 영향과 공급망 리스크 총정리

호르무즈 해협은 현재 어떤 상황일까요? 2026년 6월 기준 통항 현황, 봉쇄 영향, 유가·해상 운임 변화, 한국 기업 및 공급망 리스크를 분석했습니다.

June 5, 2026
Recent Posts
ETA vs PTA: Why Carrier ETAs Are Often Wrong — And What to Do About It
Logistics Insight
ETA vs PTA: Why Carrier ETAs Are Often Wrong — And What to Do About It

Carrier ETAs in container shipping are frequently inaccurate. Learn why — and how AI-powered Predicted Time of Arrival (PTA) gives logistics teams an independent, continuously updated second opinion on when cargo will really arrive.

June 19, 2026
North America & Global Ocean Freight Market Update: June 2026
Logistics Insight
North America & Global Ocean Freight Market Update: June 2026

Discover the latest June 2026 ocean freight market trends. Understand the impacts of the US-Iran ceasefire, rising TPEB rates, and early peak season demand on global logistics.

June 17, 2026
How to Avoid Demurrage Charges in 2026: A Container Dwell Playbook
Logistics Insight
How to Avoid Demurrage Charges in 2026: A Container Dwell Playbook

Demurrage isn't a finance problem — it's a visibility problem. Here's a 2026 playbook for tracking container dwell time, catching demurrage risk early, and reducing avoidable charges before they hit the invoice.

May 26, 2026